|
Site Announcements & Suggestions This is where you should make your suggestions to us on how to improve your experience here and where to post about site problems/issues.
Moderators |
|
Thread Tools |
#91
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Quote:
The fellow who edited out all the stage announcements on the Lou Reed 110874 show did announce what he'd done. So did the fellow who fucked with the Robert Palmer, and the goofus who diddled on the Moofy Blued dfd like wise. And all did so after snatching the show from TTD. All shows wrer complete from the master and then the people who fucked with those shows did so thinking they were doing the right thing. Who am I to tell 'em not to? Only the taper. Did I voice my displeasure? Sure as fuck did....it did no good at all.
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
#92
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Long memories.
__________________
(Name) Quote:
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#93
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Looks like nobody gives a fuck after they all were served the un-watermarked version ON DEMAND.
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
#94
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Quote:
My view hasn't changed, even though I haven't posted since the un-watermarked version was uploaded, so there was no real need for further comment on my part. Nice to know you still care, though. No members have liked this post.
|
#95
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
It's still a big fucking joke to me, especially when watching the rampant entitlement issues on this site.
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
#96
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Quote:
How is he getting ripped off? If he does find that someone is selling a mix, he mixed, because of the watermark, what can he do about it? Take them to court because he has proof he owns the recording? The only thing that makes sense to me is he wants some kind of adulation for what he has done. No members have liked this post.
|
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
yes
No members have liked this post.
|
#98
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Quote:
That's why it's all a big fucking joke to me. The recording that Tooleman put the watermark on is in circulation already anyway. Has been for years. The easiest thing to do was just ignore this "Tooleman" version altogether and just take a deep breath and and wait five minutes until you can get an unblemished version without the marking. It was just that easy....... this is all "much ado about nothing" -- right? Step back and think about this.......... Within 5 years there'll be 52 competing versions available anyway. It ain't gonna change the price of rice in China so who cares?
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
#99
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
what a bunch of shit.
__________________
"There are some of these recordings where it is just a whirring, and you cannot hear the music. " - Jimmy Page, 2007 / JUL / 26 Torrent Help: seed policy | MiniDisc ban | seed guide | Ripping |checksum (st5 ffp) | restricted bands | software | download
No members have liked this post.
|
#100
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Quote:
No, that is not at all what this is about. No members have liked this post.
|
#101
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
No, it's exactly what happened, and you're the Queen of Denial, Groucho.
Quote:
It's exactly all that happened. You'll allow 52 different remasters if they ALL are on different "silver bootlegs", and you've already said as much. Why don't you two guys get your stories straight? At least one time?
__________________
No members have liked this post.
Last edited by freezer; 2010-11-22 at 10:59 PM. |
#102
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
I deny nothing. I don't even know what you're talking about... this is still a bunch of shit.
Audio "watermarks" that are audible in normal listening are asinine.
__________________
"There are some of these recordings where it is just a whirring, and you cannot hear the music. " - Jimmy Page, 2007 / JUL / 26 Torrent Help: seed policy | MiniDisc ban | seed guide | Ripping |checksum (st5 ffp) | restricted bands | software | download
No members have liked this post.
|
#103
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Quote:
You always said that all silver boots are allowable as "Source zero" as you two have proudly proclaimed in the past. You and Billy the Bullet have said as much in the past. R E P E A T E D L Y said so. Anything else and that makes you the Queen of Denial, James-KY
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
#104
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Quote:
We likely would, as long as it wasn't lossy and I'm not denying it. We give members an opportunity to have bootleg silvers without having to pay, as long as they are not lossy and are extracted properly from the silver. don't be grumpy be happy!
__________________
"There are some of these recordings where it is just a whirring, and you cannot hear the music. " - Jimmy Page, 2007 / JUL / 26 Torrent Help: seed policy | MiniDisc ban | seed guide | Ripping |checksum (st5 ffp) | restricted bands | software | download
No members have liked this post.
|
#105
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Quote:
That means this dust-up was ONLY about someone's entitlement issues, after all.
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
The Traders' Den |
|
|