|
Site Announcements & Suggestions This is where you should make your suggestions to us on how to improve your experience here and where to post about site problems/issues.
Moderators |
View Poll Results: Should we ban mindless leechers? | |||
Yes, If their share ratio is less than 1.0 | 27 | 4.03% | |
Yes, If their share ratio is less than 0.75 | 29 | 4.33% | |
Yes, If their share ratio is less than 0.50 | 131 | 19.55% | |
Yes, If their share ratio is less than 0.25 | 158 | 23.58% | |
No, not under any circumstances. Let karma take over! | 201 | 30.00% | |
Give them a warning and allow them to make up for their wrongdoing by ul'ing constantly. | 177 | 26.42% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 670. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
#376
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Things changed, not the website & forum functionality, but the quality of shared recordings increased.
__________________
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#377
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
I freaked when I saw a commercial over the weekend for One Night with Queen (a tribute band)
wtf? are there now enough people that want to pay $50 to see a cover band?
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
#378
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
At least the Queen show is at the Tottenham Court Road end of things; it doesn't cast too great a dispersion on Shaftesbury Avenue. No members have liked this post.
|
#379
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
“Yesterday, some hooligans knocked over a dustbin in Shaftesbury” … Wooooo. The hooligans are loose! The hooligans are loose!… What if they become ruffians? I would hate to be a dustbin in Shaftesbury tonight.
Bill Hicks No members have liked this post.
|
#380
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Yep, me. The Musical Box, twice. "Selling England"-show and "Lamb Lies Down"-show, it was worth it each time.
__________________
-- "never understood the snobbishness over a microphone. I mean fuck, I killed 3 moose, 2 caribou and a bear by age 16, but I sure as hell don't go bragging about the gun used (.308). the point is to knock down the animal, not what you knock it down with. dumbass." (Ballsdeep, 2015-02-16) -- http://www.thetradersden.org/forums/...faq_audioguide No members have liked this post.
|
#381
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
I take it you never saw Genesis with Peter Gabriel then?
No members have liked this post.
|
#382
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
I was so glad I didn't pay $40 like my brother did. I'd maybe pay to see Randy Hansen doing Jimi again, haven't seen Randy since 1980 but remember enjoying that show more than MB
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
#383
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
wasnt phil collins in genesis?
__________________
Kill Your Ego!! Catch The K-Waves No members have liked this post.
|
#384
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
of course i am more than well aware of Shaftesbury Avenue in Soho, but not a place called "Shaftesbury"... is that some London hinterland known only to the initiated.... oh no, i see it's a tiny village in Dorset. surprising how well travelled Bill Hicks was.
No members have liked this post.
|
#385
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#386
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
its different for new members, yer not exactly the one these folks get upset about...most of us understand when ya first join its like a smorgasboard and many of the ones you d/l don't have any others leeching...leave yer torrents seedin and someone will hop on eventually
its the folks who have been here for years, have d/l'ed hundreds of GBs but only u/l'ed say 20 GB in return that folks get pissed at No members have liked this post.
|
#387
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
I read the first page or two of this discussion and I don't quite understand what is meant by "paying back". I always thought it meant uploading more bytes than you downloaded, and if you can upload new torrents, that is even better but not required. Some people can't upload for one reason or another, but as long as their ratio is healthy I see no problem. On some of the trackers there are the active uploaders who put up the fresh content and there are the active seeders who keep those torrents going. I think that a good tracker needs both of those types. What it *doesn't* need is the snatch'n'run leechers as well as the superseeders with the seedboxes who make it hard for regular members to build their ratio- assuming that there are ratio guidelines being enforced (if ratios are not enforced then it doesn't really matter). steeve_a P.S. I think it is impossible for everyone on a tracker to have a ratio higher than 1.0 unless there is some sort of bonus system. The seeders uploading bytes need peers to download those bytes. Which is why some trackers expect you to maintain a ratio of 0.5 No members have liked this post.
|
#388
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Even a 0.5 is a bit too high, unless some restrictions are established to those who overseed a lot.
No members have liked this post.
|
#389
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
I'm sympathetic to newbies that haven't had time to build a ratio, but they're not the ones we're discussing here.
__________________
My Goal is to become the kind of problem that people throw money at. "I'm not old, I've just been around for a long time." No members have liked this post.
|
#390
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
a person's ratio does appear under their name with each post
as far as total ratio being listed by a pserson's name in a torrent's "Peer List", that is a good idea...dunno if there's already a code written that or not No members have liked this post.
|
The Traders' Den |
Tags |
uberleechers |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
The tracker doesn't show leechers for this torrent..SOLVED !!! (tech explanation please..) - pancho1111 | Technobabble | 38 | 2008-03-16 01:28 PM | |
What happened here? 4.294.967.295 Leechers - quadrophenia | Technobabble | 3 | 2008-01-19 12:27 PM |
|
|