The Traders' Den  

  The Traders' Den > Where we go to learn ..... > Technobabble
 

Notices

Technobabble Post your general Need for Help questions here.
Lossy or Lossless?
Moderators

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 2005-07-18, 07:51 PM
Lou's Avatar
Lou Lou is offline
VH NEW ORLEANS 7/13/78
118.51 GB/224.41 GB/1.89
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
EAC Track Quality 99.9%

What is the deal with this, like why do some tracks come out 99.9%, with the error correction coming at the tail end of the track? Is the acceptability of this marginal or is it OK? If you see this should you be trying to re-rip to get it to 100%?
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #2  
Old 2005-07-18, 08:08 PM
dancin_carrot's Avatar
dancin_carrot dancin_carrot is offline
listen to k.h.b.r.
47.27 GB/45.18 GB/0.96
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: BC
Re: EAC Track Quality 99.9%

As far as I know, getting less than 100% simply means it took more than one attempt to rip that track perfectly. As long as it says copy ok at the bottom, the track is fine.
__________________

Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #3  
Old 2005-07-18, 08:27 PM
Lou's Avatar
Lou Lou is offline
VH NEW ORLEANS 7/13/78
118.51 GB/224.41 GB/1.89
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
Re: EAC Track Quality 99.9%

OK good, thanks.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #4  
Old 2005-07-18, 08:38 PM
dancin_carrot's Avatar
dancin_carrot dancin_carrot is offline
listen to k.h.b.r.
47.27 GB/45.18 GB/0.96
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: BC
Re: EAC Track Quality 99.9%

Just a bit more detail from http://users.pandora.be/satcp/eac07.htm

Quote:
While Peak level tells nothing about the quality of extraction, Track quality does. A Track quality of 100% obviously means that the track was extracted 100% correct. But here's where some people make mistakes; sometimes EAC rereads certain audio sectors multiple times to get accurate extraction results. For every reread EAC does, the Track quality decreases, but this does not mean that the extraction is less accurate. It is possible to have a bit-by-bit perfect copy of a track, while Track quality is lower than 100%. As long as Exact Audio Copy does not report any errors in the Status and Error Messages log, the extracted files are bit-by-bit perfect copies of the original. Track quality should be interpreted as the physical quality of the CD and not of the extracted data. A CD with some scratches or dirty fingers on will certainly cause rereads in EAC and thus a Track quality lower than 100%, but still the extracted tracks may be perfect. Thus if the log says Copy OK for a track that means it's extracted perfect - no matter of the Track quality. So, I hope that made things more clear as many people are confused by the Track quality.
__________________

Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #5  
Old 2005-07-18, 08:48 PM
Lou's Avatar
Lou Lou is offline
VH NEW ORLEANS 7/13/78
118.51 GB/224.41 GB/1.89
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
Re: EAC Track Quality 99.9%

That's excellent because I always just assumed that anything less than 100% meant it was near perfect, but EAC couldn't get it to perfection due to scratches, smudges, etc.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #6  
Old 2005-07-18, 09:19 PM
pmonk's Avatar
pmonk pmonk is offline
510.95 GB/621.08 GB/1.22
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: EAC Track Quality 99.9%

IMO - I think it has to do with the inferior mechanics that bootleg companies use to mass produce silvers (compared to a major label like Sony)

When I get a new boot the first think I do is rip it and put it away and listen to it on a cd-r!

The only time Dragon Snake was removed from its sleeve was right into my computer and put back where it shall remain!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #7  
Old 2005-07-18, 10:16 PM
Lou's Avatar
Lou Lou is offline
VH NEW ORLEANS 7/13/78
118.51 GB/224.41 GB/1.89
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
Re: EAC Track Quality 99.9%

Yeah actually the reason I posted was because I saw that, it's like how could something unused before get 99.9% and not 100%?
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #8  
Old 2005-07-19, 12:10 AM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
TTD Staff
186.65 GB/588.32 GB/3.15
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: EAC Track Quality 99.9%

This used to confuse me, too... I used to rip and re-rip trying to get 100% on all tracks but also noticed that the checksum were identical so long as it said "copy ok"
__________________
Checksums Demystified EAC Config MakeTorrent WinAmp Config

Modern social theory casts a highly skeptical eye on any declaration that a group of persons is without conflict, and insists, on the contrary, that conflict is natural to groups, and even more, is essential to them. -Patrick Henry
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #9  
Old 2005-07-19, 03:32 AM
Quux2112
0.00 KB/0.00 KB/---
 
Re: EAC Track Quality 99.9%

As others have said, as long as the checksums match, the track was ripped perfectly.

However, I have heard that EAC can report "Copy OK" and still have non-matching checksums. I've never seen this happen, just heard that it can. Whether it's true or not, it's probably always a good idea to compare the checksums and not just rely on the "Copy OK" message.

What I have seen happen though, is EAC rip a scratched track, report copy OK, give matching checksums, but still have a very brief bit of silence in the track where the scratch was. So it's also usually a good idea to listen to your rips before sharing.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #10  
Old 2005-07-19, 04:09 AM
guygee's Avatar
guygee guygee is offline
Non Serviam
1.17 TB/2.93 TB/2.50
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Astro Intergalactic Infinity
Re: EAC Track Quality 99.9%

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quux2112
As others have said, as long as the checksums match, the track was ripped perfectly.

However, I have heard that EAC can report "Copy OK" and still have non-matching checksums. I've never seen this happen, just heard that it can. Whether it's true or not, it's probably always a good idea to compare the checksums and not just rely on the "Copy OK" message.

What I have seen happen though, is EAC rip a scratched track, report copy OK, give matching checksums, but still have a very brief bit of silence in the track where the scratch was. So it's also usually a good idea to listen to your rips before sharing.
Since EAC uses rereads and a "voting scheme" to try and correct errors in bad sectors, there is a very small (but finite) probability that a sector can be misread and still report OK, so what you say about non-matching checksums makes sense (although this should be very rare). However, as almost everyone has said above, if the checksums match the probability that an error occurred should be essentially zero.

From the EAC site:
"In secure mode, this program reads every audio sector at least twice. That is one reason why the program is so slow. But by using this technique non-identical sectors are detected. If an error occurs (read or sync error), the program keeps on reading this sector, until eight of 16 retries are identical, but at maximum one, three or five times (according to the error recovery quality) these 16 retries are read. So, in the worst case, bad sectors are read up to 82 times! But this will help the program to obtain best result by comparing all of the retries. If it is not sure that the stream is correct (at least it can be said at approx. 99.5%) the program will tell the user where the (possible) read error occurred."
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
Reply

The Traders' Den > Where we go to learn ..... > Technobabble

Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Can EAC CD's into one track? - RetroDude83 Technobabble 2 2009-02-18 12:33 PM
EAC Track Quality Question - jamroom Technobabble 6 2008-09-02 04:17 PM
TLH says track looks like MPEG with probability 95%? - jeeweewee Technobabble 4 2007-06-28 05:49 AM
How do i turn a 4-track into FLAC - kickin wing Technobabble 3 2005-03-12 06:00 PM


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forums


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - , TheTradersDen.org - All Rights Reserved - Hosted at QuickPacket
no new posts