The Traders' Den  

  The Traders' Den > Where we go to learn ..... > Technobabble
 

Notices

Technobabble Post your general Need for Help questions here.
Lossy or Lossless?
Moderators

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 2015-07-09, 01:29 AM
leykis101 leykis101 is offline
236.89 GB/583.47 GB/2.46
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Recording quality question

Had a question.

normally roll my recording at 16bit, but if I record it at 24 bit is it easy to down size it to 16 bit? easy to use software to do it?

Is it worth it to do it that way, (I end up burning all my recordings to cdr discs for my listening, instead of storing it on a hard drive). Is there a noticeable sound difference?

thanks in advance
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #2  
Old 2015-07-09, 08:47 AM
DanielG's Avatar
DanielG DanielG is offline
300.35 GB/438.48 GB/1.46
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Re: Recording quality question

Yeah, it's easy to resample a 24 bit recording down to 16 bit. There's a program called r8Brain that will do it.

http://www.voxengo.com/product/r8brain/

Is it worth recording in 24 bit? Well if you're just going to be listening to it in 16 bit and you're not planning on keeping the 24 bit version, then it's a bit pointless. Depending on the quality of your mics you may not even be able to hear the difference.

Try it out youself and see what you think/
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #3  
Old 2015-07-09, 08:53 AM
sloppyart's Avatar
sloppyart sloppyart is offline
I dream in beige.
100.09 GB/1.27 TB/13.02
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Boulder/Denver, Co
Re: Recording quality question

The main advantage of recording at 24 bit is that you will have less degradation of the sound quality after you perform any changes such as EQ and changing levels.

I always record at 24/48 so I can make changes in post with the least amount of trouble.

A nice advantage of this is being able to run your levels a little lower at the show to give you more margin of error from clipping and then boost the levels in post.

I generally don't share my 24 bit recordings because I don't think they sound any better, but it is nice to have the 24 bit masters.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #4  
Old 2015-07-09, 10:53 PM
rspencer's Avatar
rspencer rspencer is offline
TTD Hoarder
TTD Staff
262.05 GB/271.31 GB/1.04
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: the outer limits
Re: Recording quality question



What sloppyart said.
I record at 24 bit, but only share (or even listen to) 16 bit.
Recording levels can be conservative because (in general simple terms) the "lowest" 8 bits will be truncated, much of which is noise.
__________________
My main list .... My masters

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcbullet View Post
Sometimes im dense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcbullet View Post
I hate not being a real man.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
Reply

The Traders' Den > Where we go to learn ..... > Technobabble

Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
EAC Track Quality Question - jamroom Technobabble 6 2008-09-02 04:17 PM
Jb3 recording question...urgent. - sweatboard Technobabble 7 2007-03-05 10:09 AM
New Collector Question re Lineage, Burning, Quality Loss, etc - ZosoPlayer Technobabble 10 2007-01-08 08:22 AM
mp3-sourced or just a low quality recording/transfer? - Gizby Lossy or Lossless? 11 2005-04-26 05:17 PM


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forums


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - , TheTradersDen.org - All Rights Reserved - Hosted at QuickPacket
no new posts