|
Technobabble Post your general Need for Help questions here.
• Lossy or Lossless? Moderators |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
Please give a real answer. If you don't know, don't post, unless you're hijacking the thread with something funny, or you want to argue. That would be funny, but, seriously, don't lie if you don't know. I seek an honest truth.
No members have liked this post.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
I don't know who told you that, but they are full of shit. It has replaced shn (shorten) as the standard. SHN's are archaic. And it is quicker and more stable than that monkey ape shit.
Just my opinon, but not sure who thinks they are bad. Most bands who offer live shows on their sites offer in flac form. No members have liked this post.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
FLAC = Fucking Lossy Audio Crap
That's why it sucks. No members have liked this post.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
Quote:
Thanks, -The Wicker Man No members have liked this post.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
Yeah, FLAC support these days is much better than that for Shorten. For instance, there are FLAC plugins for pretty much every major media player in Linux, but our only options for Shorten playback are either an XMMS plugin or command-line playback. Since I've never gotten XMMS to compile properly, I'm having to run foobar2000 under Wine to playback Shorten files. I really don't know why there isn't a gstreamer plugin for Shorten.
The only problem with FLACs is that if you use etree's md5check script and some idiot included md5s with their FLAC files, it will check both the md5s and the fingerprints, so it takes twice as long as it should to check the files. This is why you should never include md5s with FLAC files--just include a text file with the fingerprints. No members have liked this post.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
And that was nice. Thank you. Anyway, so, who is talking about technical stuff? I didn't hear anything.
No members have liked this post.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
any else think sara is wired
__________________
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
Quote:
Thank you. No members have liked this post.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is FLAC supposedly so bad?
Who is this guy? I think him and Sara would be a match made in heaven
__________________
DON'T MESSAGE ME FOR RE-SEEDS. I DO NOT DO THEM! AND UNLESS THEY WERE RECORDED THAT WAY, THERE WILL BE NO MORE 16 BIT VERSIONS. No members have liked this post.
|
The Traders' Den |
Thread Tools | |
|
|