|
Site Announcements & Suggestions This is where you should make your suggestions to us on how to improve your experience here and where to post about site problems/issues.
Moderators |
View Poll Results: Should we ban mindless leechers? | |||
Yes, If their share ratio is less than 1.0 | 27 | 4.03% | |
Yes, If their share ratio is less than 0.75 | 29 | 4.33% | |
Yes, If their share ratio is less than 0.50 | 131 | 19.55% | |
Yes, If their share ratio is less than 0.25 | 158 | 23.58% | |
No, not under any circumstances. Let karma take over! | 201 | 30.00% | |
Give them a warning and allow them to make up for their wrongdoing by ul'ing constantly. | 177 | 26.42% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 670. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
#286
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
That makes maybe 3 out of 1600.
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#287
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
thanks BK that's better
__________________
"We're here to have a ball." Art Blakey "Reality is a hallucination brought on by lack of alcohol." Graham Chapman "I'll drink to your health til it ruins mine" Art Blakey "Trust a pro" Keith Richards "here is my offer: nothing" Mike C No members have liked this post.
|
#288
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
----------------- You talk the talk, but have you ever walked the walk? Still, after all that -- it just doesn't seem that anything ever got you to go out and make any new recordings to add to the trade pool.......
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
#289
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
> No members have liked this post.
|
#290
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#291
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
The whole thread is opinion, captain obvious
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#292
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Correct, opinions are like assholes....everybody's got one.
However when you share your opinion on "hoarding" and then just as quickly admit that you refuse to even try to make any recordings, then in my opinion, your credibility got flushed down the crapper, in reference to this hobby. People who mouth off about "Hoarding" and and also refuse to ever contribute to the trade pool should have no right to mouth off. You wanna talk the talk, but you refuse to walk the walk? Are you really serious? What makes you think you deserve to partake of The Little Red Hen's wheat, when you refuse to help harvest, threshing, milling, or baking the bread? Quote:
Maybe you should learn to take what's offered without demanding anything... instead of rationalizing a truckload of manure there, Major Pain. If you want to make any noise about "hoarding", then maybe first you need to consider learning to try to give something back. Stop dancing for ONE show and get proactive toward "YOUR" community. Or like many tapers already have done....you just might consider paying it forward....sound like a plan? Oh, and I do understand "sharing", but I also see you sharing your hypocracy here. Or, hey, consider refraining from ever making remarks about "hoarding" when you absolutely refuse to do anything but take. And Bill, I like you, really.....people talk bad about you, but I like you.
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
#293
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
Quote:
Seriously though, I have contributed to the community for some time. Maybe not taping, but I have given none-the-less. I know you know that, but apparently if you do not tape, it is not contributing in your opinion. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#294
|
||||||
|
||||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
Including my contempt on this issue, OK? Your greed is showing through again, Bill..... Quote:
Maybe that's what's the problem, could it be that you don't know how to mind your business even after you're told to go away. Or maybe you could have shaken something loose, IF you had something unique to offer in return, something you taped??? I guess you'll never know, huh? Quote:
This taper thinks you're just a parasite, with the attitude you're exhibiting. I'm sure I ain't the only one to feel like that. Quote:
What I see is that the bus left and you didn't make it. Personally, the disdain I feel toward this sort of mindset will preclude me from ever listening to that Grateful Dead crap again. Best of luck to you, but anything I might have taped of those snoozers is at the bottom of the list when it comes to offering anything. However, as I said many times previously, I trade... And the people I've traded with aren't interested in that mindless noodling either. Sorry (no I not really, I just don't care.) Quote:
There was a reason STG died the death, and a very, very, very, VERY large percentage of the TTD couldn't care less about that old news. Your mileage may vary, especially since that 1968 VW bus you're driving can't get uphill any longer. Quote:
It's 40 years on now, Jerry's as dead as all fucking billy-hell, he's copped the last heroin he's ever gonna fix-up -- and you've yet to do anything proactive towards your "community" to keep it from dying steadily, no matter how many times you pat yourself on the back. Your "entitlement" issues are a disgrace, not a goddam badge of honor. BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-oh, you sure told me, shucks..... Major..... If you'd like to continue this, let's take it to the taper's forum, shall we? Let's leave this thread to all "ratio police" to get back to sneering at vlad's numbers, OK? We can start a new thread there and let's see if anyone there salutes you, Bill.
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
#295
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
Torrenting is also a very good thing. I wonder if, tech speaking, torrent is the last and final word on distributed file sharing, or if some new revolutionary approach will be developed over the next few years. to self No members have liked this post.
|
#296
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
YOUR opinion. Others feel differently. The mileage varies, don't it though? For every positive you see in making music trading more impersonal, there are the same number of negatives. (For example, not forcing collectors to at least considering to add something new and unique to the trade pool for every something they take. Consider the number of shows NEVER recorded by giving out free rides to anyone with the means to grab and go.) Quote:
Garbage in, garbage out.... New delivery systems don't ensure that what you grabbed is actually what some good "seeder" says it is. New delivery systems don't ensure the best version, just newer and quicker forms of instant gratification of garbage copies also. In the almost 5 years that I've been supplying TTD with copies from my master tapes, I'm noticing a new trend: "good" collectors re-mastering my tapes and fucking up their remaster, then circulating it without all the pertinent info. The NRPS 1976-05-30 recording I made and had offered at TTD first is now making the rounds in an altered form, that is now corrupted. And that corrupt copy is supplanting the original unblemished master. Imagine that: someone had to 'monkey' with a master tape for NO other reason than to put their name on it. A different torrent site is now passing around an mp3 version of something that was first offered here from my master in lossless format. Imagine that: someone took one of my masters from this site, converted it to mp3, then someone converted that back into analog, then someone turned that back into a digital format. I eagerly await that version to make the rounds here. Garbage in, garbage out..... but at least someone else got to add their name to the recording as the "re-master-er" while removing the taper's name and other info. Don't you just love it? Garbage in, garbage out.
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
#297
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
I feel entitled to the opinions of others
__________________
"We're here to have a ball." Art Blakey "Reality is a hallucination brought on by lack of alcohol." Graham Chapman "I'll drink to your health til it ruins mine" Art Blakey "Trust a pro" Keith Richards "here is my offer: nothing" Mike C No members have liked this post.
|
#298
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
I was referring to distributed file sharing in general. Old school tape sharing doesn't doesn't guarantee so-called quality or lineage accuracy. The person lying/bluffing can do it on a hand-written paper as well as on a message forum. The only one difference is the media.
No members have liked this post.
|
#299
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
That's true, Jack, it's just as easy for some unethical trader to fabricate lineage on paper. However, thanks to torrents, it's easier for you to fuck over 1,000 random people in a fraction of the time that it used to take you to fuck over one person you know via snail mail. Put up a torrent tonight and give out your bullshit lineage, and by tomorrow evening you can fuck over literally 10,000 unsuspecting collectors. Then as you watch it mushroom when the torrent is snatched and then re-upped at dime, Lossless Legs, zomb, planet bootleg, tapecity, hungercity, etree, MOTB, ad infinitum. Then figure how many more collectors you can fuck over as the garbage hits the torrent-blogs like "Quality bootlegs" or "The Pharaoh's Den", etc etc etc.... You can guarantee that a specific recording will NEVER circulate with correct lineage thanks to a torrent. As you well know, we can prove it, Demmy. Would you like to help conduct that experiment? There are two differences to snail mail trading in that : #1. Trading between tapers generally cut the possibility of bad lineage. *Didn't erase the possibility, as I can attest to, but it made it easier to rectify* (I could have made sure that snail mail traders knew that someone in the KISS community had lied about the proper lineage to the July 16, 1974 KISS in Baton Rouge recording. Thanks to the torrent sites, it had snowballed to proportions that will never be able to be rectified.... oh well.....) #2. It was easier to halt bad lineage, because many tapers knew who was taping in other areas or territories. It was easier to learn who had actually taped something and therefore easier to acquire a 1st gen or a low gen copy, or to out the liar and oust them from trading. In the land of the torrent, these liars are rewarded. There's NO guarantees anywhere in life, Dr. Mehoff, ever....but at least the possibilities for being duped were significantly diminished if and when two tapers were trading. (Especially IF they were planning to trade again together later. Why bite the hand that feeds you?) And I'm glad to see you getting along so delightfully with your own 2 hands. At least you can finally make love to someone who might like you.
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
#300
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
operative word: Might
__________________
"We're here to have a ball." Art Blakey "Reality is a hallucination brought on by lack of alcohol." Graham Chapman "I'll drink to your health til it ruins mine" Art Blakey "Trust a pro" Keith Richards "here is my offer: nothing" Mike C No members have liked this post.
|
The Traders' Den |
Tags |
uberleechers |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
The tracker doesn't show leechers for this torrent..SOLVED !!! (tech explanation please..) - pancho1111 | Technobabble | 38 | 2008-03-16 02:28 PM | |
What happened here? 4.294.967.295 Leechers - quadrophenia | Technobabble | 3 | 2008-01-19 01:27 PM |
|
|