Any experts here? lossy or lossless?

[vold911]

ALL OF THESE ARE ZOOMED IN SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT AUDIENCE TAPED SHOWS FROM 1981
ANY LOSSY ONES?

1
http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/8514/8111151.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/441/8111151.jpg/)

2
http://img560.imageshack.us/img560/2016/8111152.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/560/8111152.jpg/)

3
http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/672/8111153.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/221/8111153.jpg/)

4
http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/4944/8111191.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/38/8111191.jpg/)

5
http://img804.imageshack.us/img804/739/8111192.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/804/8111192.jpg/)

6
http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/8213/811203.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/37/811203.jpg/)

7
http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/7852/811204.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/94/811204.jpg/)

[vold911]

the ones i believe are lossy are 6 and 7 and im suspicious about 1
3 looks excellent, and the lines in 2,4 and 5 i have no idea what is

[Drgiggles1]

1, 6, and 7 lossy imho.

[tonebloke]

As Dr G says 1,6 and 7 are lossy.
5 is just nasty. Lossless but there must have been some eletrical activity around/near taper. Too many artifacts to be a loose connection.
2 and 4 seem like Dat.


:wave: