Lossy?

[quadrophenia]

Thanks for your help.

[paddington]

hard to say.. it doesn't show the stark blocks you usually see with MP3, though the frequencies are rolled off (or seem to be). Could just be a recording from freq-limited mics, etc.


more info about it or an audio clip?

[quadrophenia]

The original uploader says this is lossless sourced from soundboard. I want to upload it here. Short sound sample:

http://rapidshare.com/files/102615292/102.flac.html

[paddington]

ok.. this is a bit tough. It's obvious that some of the frquencies are missing. I do not think a SBD recording wuld have that problem - unless the SBD's master EQ was pulled down and rolling them off on purpose for PA reasons, etc...

I do not see the obvious blocky artifacts you normally see in MP3. Or AC3, for that matter (which is usually still blocky, just not as much as MP3).

Here is a 100% lossless audio slice from a studio album, 1 sec span:


http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/7407/48524842je5.jpg


and here is your audio:

http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/3378/z1uu1.jpg



The texture is very similar. It isn't as clean, but it is a live recording against a studio recording.


I really can't say if this is lossy or not. I do not think it is - but what happened to the high frequencies?

I'm going to get another staff member to come hava a look at this and see what he thinks.

[Five]

I agree no evidence its lossy but the cutoff is supicious... viewed in black and white it comes up looking like 32kHz DAT (http://www.thetradersden.org/forums/showthread.php?t=11077) to me. So its fine to trade imo.

[quadrophenia]

Maybe it's noise reduced?

Thanks for helping.

[Five]

yeah also could be nr (?) ... not certain

you're welcome

[LeifH12345]

How about this one?
http://i29.tinypic.com/2wrhpno.jpg

[LeifH12345]

what about this guy? looks kinda...bad.
http://i27.tinypic.com/20ict1w.jpg

[Five]

I can't even tell what I'm looking at from those, sorry.