View Single Post
Old 2010-11-10, 06:00 PM
mudshark68's Avatar
mudshark68 mudshark68 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 742 Evergreen Terrace
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?

Originally Posted by freezer View Post
Originally Posted by Five View Post
because there's only one person on earth who would do this!

Not any more, Jamie.

Every uncirculating master of mine will now come with freshly added watermarks, OK?

Suck 'em down or don't and see if I care.
And that's kinda my point 'em or don't. I really don't care. If I d/l a recording that has annoying things added to it, I'll delete it and I'll eventually stop d/l'ing your posts anyway. Its really no biggie. But to intentionally add your name over music is a bit ridiculous, imo. Someone remasters a show and gets mad because someone takes it and makes more changes. Ever think maybe the artists are annoyed people want to take credit for their work?

Kinda hypocritical isn't it? Someone takes someone else's work, tinkers with it, and gets mad because someone else takes their work and tinkers some more?

May your shit come to life and kiss you on the face.
-- Frank Zappa, to Mrs. Gore about parental advisory labels on album covers