The Traders' Den  

  The Traders' Den > Where we go to learn ..... > Technobabble
 

Notices

Technobabble Post your general Need for Help questions here.
Lossy or Lossless?
Moderators

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 2004-12-29, 05:06 PM
Punkishlyevil Punkishlyevil is offline
30.98 GB/42.38 GB/1.37
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Unrealistic Flac compression

Someone in the TSP/Zwan hub seeded a show today. They ripped it from a CD to a wav file and compressed it to level 8 flacs. The flac bitrates are ranging from high 200s to high 300s. This seems way to low of a bitrate for a flac. This seems more like an mp3 bitrate. When I mentioned this to him he reripped a track and flaced it and it did the same thing. He seeded a different show also today and did the same thing, but when he flaced it it did normal 600-900 kb/s bitrates. So does anyone have any clue why these bitrates are so low? Do you want frequency analysis pictures from eac/analfreq?
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #2  
Old 2004-12-29, 06:09 PM
U2Lynne's Avatar
U2Lynne U2Lynne is offline
TTD Staff
474.39 GB/2.01 TB/4.34
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
Re: Unrealistic Flac compression

Well, the pictures would certainly help to tell the story, so I would grab a 1.5 to 2 second picture from the middle of a track (I think that is what Five usually asks for).
__________________
Five's Checksums Demystified - everything and anything you want to know about checksums
On a Mac? Get XLD to rip your CDs. Please see this guide - X Lossless Decoder (XLD): How to create flawless CD rips on Mac OS X


Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #3  
Old 2004-12-29, 06:17 PM
Punkishlyevil Punkishlyevil is offline
30.98 GB/42.38 GB/1.37
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: Unrealistic Flac compression

What kind of picture? A spectral analysis or a frequency analysis? EAC or analfreq or Cool Edit Pro 2.0?
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #4  
Old 2004-12-29, 06:21 PM
U2Lynne's Avatar
U2Lynne U2Lynne is offline
TTD Staff
474.39 GB/2.01 TB/4.34
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
Re: Unrealistic Flac compression

I believe analfreq is the tool most are using these days. And we like to see both a spectral analysis and a frequency analysis.
__________________
Five's Checksums Demystified - everything and anything you want to know about checksums
On a Mac? Get XLD to rip your CDs. Please see this guide - X Lossless Decoder (XLD): How to create flawless CD rips on Mac OS X


Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #5  
Old 2004-12-29, 11:03 PM
RainDawg's Avatar
RainDawg RainDawg is offline
Renegade Geek
10.20 GB/20.72 GB/2.03
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Passing swiftly through The Moor
Re: Unrealistic Flac compression

That is quite low, but no need to assume mp3. If the source material is a mono signal, bitrates this low can indeed happen with FLAC. In fact, if you take audio and go FLAC > MP3 > FLAC, the chances are that the second file will have almost identical bitrate as the first one....compressing to lossy formats and then back don't change the compression much.

I'd still like to see a spectral anlysis and frequency sweep plot, but I'm going to venture a guess that it's mono lossless rather than mp3...
__________________
Through the clouds,
Throught the lies,
We'll never see,
What's never been,
At the ending of life and the coming of death,
Pass not through its gates but into the dark.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #6  
Old 2004-12-29, 11:44 PM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: Unrealistic Flac compression

this is easy to solve. make md5 sums for the original WAV files, then decompress the FLACs you made in another folder and check if the decompressed WAVs (from your FLACs) are identical or not.
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #7  
Old 2004-12-30, 12:06 AM
Punkishlyevil Punkishlyevil is offline
30.98 GB/42.38 GB/1.37
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: Unrealistic Flac compression

Frequency/spectral pictures.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg AnalFreq.jpg
( 78.3 KB, 56 views)
 
File Type: jpg EAC FreqAnalysis.jpg
( 106.0 KB, 40 views)
 
File Type: jpg EAC SpecAnalysis.jpg
( 170.8 KB, 36 views)
 
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #8  
Old 2004-12-30, 12:08 AM
Punkishlyevil Punkishlyevil is offline
30.98 GB/42.38 GB/1.37
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: Unrealistic Flac compression

I'm not really worried if its mp3, because mp3s wouldn't make a flac compress so much. The person who ripped the CD and I were both just very confused by why it is so compressed. The mono explanation would make sense though.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #9  
Old 2004-12-30, 01:10 AM
feralicious's Avatar
feralicious feralicious is offline
dare to discover
63.44 GB/133.91 GB/2.11
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: occasionally
Re: Unrealistic Flac compression

Quote:
Originally Posted by Punkishlyevil
Frequency/spectral pictures.
Also, I would do the spectral analysis in CoolEdit as we discovered in another thread here that EAC SAs aren't very reliable.

Mods: maybe there should be a sticky about that? I don't think that problem is well known.
__________________
feralicious goodies
Don't get even.
Get odd.

....
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #10  
Old 2004-12-30, 01:19 AM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: Unrealistic Flac compression

Quote:
Originally Posted by feralicious
Also, I would do the spectral analysis in CoolEdit as we discovered in another thread here that EAC SAs aren't very reliable.

Mods: maybe there should be a sticky about that? I don't think that problem is well known.
CEP/Audition is the best for sure... EAC has proven not very reliable. We need a freeware solution for people, too I'm thinking up a solution for this.
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #11  
Old 2004-12-30, 01:30 AM
New Homebrew
0.00 KB/0.00 KB/---
 
Re: Unrealistic Flac compression

Quote:
Originally Posted by Punkishlyevil
I'm not really worried if its mp3, because mp3s wouldn't make a flac compress so much. The person who ripped the CD and I were both just very confused by why it is so compressed. The mono explanation would make sense though.
It looks like an mp3 source to me based on the spectral view, although i don't think that's the cause of the small torrent size.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #12  
Old 2004-12-30, 02:01 AM
feralicious's Avatar
feralicious feralicious is offline
dare to discover
63.44 GB/133.91 GB/2.11
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: occasionally
Re: Unrealistic Flac compression

Yeah and that Anal Freq pic doesn't look too good.
__________________
feralicious goodies
Don't get even.
Get odd.

....
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #13  
Old 2004-12-30, 02:09 AM
Punkishlyevil Punkishlyevil is offline
30.98 GB/42.38 GB/1.37
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: Unrealistic Flac compression

Quote:
Originally Posted by feralicious
Yeah and that Anal Freq pic doesn't look too good.
Yeah when I saw the AnalFreq I was a bit worried.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #14  
Old 2004-12-30, 02:11 AM
Punkishlyevil Punkishlyevil is offline
30.98 GB/42.38 GB/1.37
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: Unrealistic Flac compression

Cool Edit.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Cool Edit.jpg
( 143.6 KB, 189 views)
 
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #15  
Old 2004-12-30, 04:16 AM
NINJA's Avatar
NINJA NINJA is offline
Banned
795.31 MB/607.86 MB/0.76
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: Unrealistic Flac compression

Quote:
Originally Posted by Punkishlyevil
Cool Edit.

looks pretty normal for a 60's or early 70's audience recording


can also indicate noise reduction was used
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
Reply

The Traders' Den > Where we go to learn ..... > Technobabble

Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
? Compression Question ? - sixstringmartinsix Technobabble 4 2006-08-01 08:33 AM
video compression - obcd Technobabble 4 2006-06-19 06:23 AM
lossy or high compression MD? - rhinowing Lossy or Lossless? 4 2006-03-07 03:37 PM
video compression - is it possible...and how? - mcwanks Technobabble 7 2006-03-06 11:10 AM
FM compression or .mp3 ? - alchemy71085 Lossy or Lossless? 19 2005-10-07 09:26 PM


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forums


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - , TheTradersDen.org - All Rights Reserved - Hosted at QuickPacket