The Traders' Den  

  The Traders' Den > Where we go to learn ..... > Technobabble
 

Notices

Technobabble Post your general Need for Help questions here.
Lossy or Lossless?
Moderators

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #106  
Old 2009-08-08, 10:55 AM
AAR.oner's Avatar
AAR.oner AAR.oner is offline
TTD Staff
1.11 TB/1.41 TB/1.27
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Re: mp3/lossless question for audiophiles...

i wouldn't think him being on another comp would have any effect [even if on same network]...the issues arise when yer comp's processing resources are being strained by multiple progs running
__________________
TTD's Gear Lust Forum -- info & reviews on taping gear
The Basics of EQing
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #107  
Old 2009-08-08, 11:18 AM
paddington's Avatar
paddington paddington is offline
crumpet-stuffer
TTD Staff
87.48 GB/884.33 GB/10.11
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Re: mp3/lossless question for audiophiles...

Quote:
Originally Posted by dealtadawn View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Five View Post
about every month there's a thread about mp3 saying "I can't hear the diff!!", well most average ppl can't and that's why this is a rare site.

there's another issue with encoding where if any small change needs to be made to the mp3 audio including simply retracking it you have to double-compress it, then it gets burned to a disc and extracted while playing cpu-intense video games adding some crackes, then re-encoded to mp3 by another guy (triple-compressed) and so on and so on.

go find some of the other threads with "mp3" in the title and you'll see endless discussions on this, or just repeat to yourself "no mp3 at ttd" and you'll sleep better at night.
I was just explaining to my husband yesterday why I need him to not be playing World of Warcraft when I'm converting or burning shows to disc. Is my assumption that it would add cracks etc even if he's on a different computer but we are on the same network correct?
no. It's actually probably better, because then he won't be bothering you while your burn your discs
__________________
"There are some of these recordings where it is just a whirring, and you cannot hear the music. " - Jimmy Page, 2007 / JUL / 26
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #108  
Old 2009-08-08, 12:19 PM
dealtadawn's Avatar
dealtadawn dealtadawn is offline
17.78 GB/20.27 GB/1.14
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Re: mp3/lossless question for audiophiles...

Quote:
Originally Posted by jameskg View Post
no. It's actually probably better, because then he won't be bothering you while your burn your discs
lol, actually he'd probably be standing behind me if he's not on his own computer. i just wondered if it would bog down the network resources if there is such a thing. anyway, since i have 744mg of data it is a mute point until i figure out how to get that on a 700mg disc...

but ty for the info.
__________________
Stephanie Dawn

Quote:
Originally Posted by RainDawg
No one is going to insult you for asking a question here....
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #109  
Old 2009-08-17, 07:58 PM
Forgot Forgot is offline
1.98 GB/725.43 MB/0.36
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Re: mp3/lossless question for audiophiles...

heh came back two years later and i'm surprised to have my old post stickied, and a few mbs on my uploads... btw, i'm still not convinced of the virtue of lossless, other than the fact that it's valuable to traders... and hence i should have as much lossless as possible if i want to trade...
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #110  
Old 2009-08-20, 07:16 AM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: mp3/lossless question for audiophiles...

yeah if you never trade lossless is not important beyond personal listening preference, its a free country
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #111  
Old 2009-08-30, 04:48 AM
pjposterguy pjposterguy is offline
4.28 GB/21.28 GB/4.97
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL-South Burbs
Re: mp3/lossless question for audiophiles...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Forgot View Post
Can anyone actually HEAR any quality difference between a shn original file and high bitrate mp3 convert?

i don't mean "loss of data within human hearing range"... i know data are lost... what i'm asking is whether the lost IN QUALITY is perceivable....

i just converted a bunch of shn files to mp3, and on my 5 bucks speaker, i can just barely hear enough difference to know that they're not the same, but that's only if i put the speaker right on my ear and play it with very low volume...

if i have to say,short of living in a sound proof chamber, the humming from an average computer probably spoils the sound more than than the conversion from shn to mp3... either that or i happen to be deaf in those frequencies lost during the conversion.
YES you/I can the highest mp3 can only get fairly close to a AIFF/FLAC... (don't get me started on .wav) generally it's a loss of the "weight" in the low end, and nerfing the highs, not to mention loss of imaging/soundstaging (ie spatial placement of instruments, and the "air" inbetween.... now if only the world would STOP using PCM encoding... DSD ftw
__________________
If I could bring a (ultimate) recording RIG to every show.....(venue, material dependent of course)
AKG/Neuman/Schoeps/DPA mics > Neve or Hardy Preamps > Prisim DSD A/D conv. > sonic solutions software (mac of course)... ALL cabled by Synergistic Research Designer's Reference cables... shockmount racks by MTCases...
Hi-Fi playback: Alesis Masterlink ML-9600 (no comments, I just can;t get a good price on SACD)>S.R. P2>Coleman level controller>S.R. P1> Genelec 1031AP
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #112  
Old 2009-09-02, 01:30 AM
trustthex's Avatar
trustthex trustthex is offline
Trainwreckin' Fool
615.69 GB/3.17 TB/5.27
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Denton, TX
Re: mp3/lossless question for audiophiles...

Quote:
Originally Posted by pjposterguy View Post
YES you/I can the highest mp3 can only get fairly close to a AIFF/FLAC... (don't get me started on .wav) generally it's a loss of the "weight" in the low end, and nerfing the highs, not to mention loss of imaging/soundstaging (ie spatial placement of instruments, and the "air" inbetween.... now if only the world would STOP using PCM encoding... DSD ftw


DSD is dead. Even Sony is beginning the funeral process. Sorry.
__________________
The critics of the Information Age see everything in the negative, as if the quantity of information can lead to a loss of meaning. They said the same thing about Gutenberg.
-Timothy Leary


Meatwad: I thought you said TV was bad.
Frylock: It is. But we fucking need it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by general eclectic
There's a big difference between getting trashed and disappearing.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #113  
Old 2010-05-19, 01:45 PM
slewofboots's Avatar
slewofboots slewofboots is offline
267.31 GB/2.55 TB/9.76
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Re: mp3/lossless question for audiophiles...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn=) View Post
I listen on decent phones, and absolutely the difference between mp3 and lossless is clear.

I do have a lot of music I've converted over to mp3 either at 256k or 320k, and the higher sample rates are certainly listenable, and much more portable. My essential music is all archived on CD/CD-R, etc..

Shawn
I would argue that for a lot of music genres FLAC (lvl 8) is not much less portable than high-bitrate encoded MP3. In other words filesize is close to 320kbps mp3.
I assume there exist portables capable of FLAC playback?

If so, and with decent headphones, this is certainly the way to be (more) portable and lossless!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #114  
Old 2010-05-19, 02:13 PM
slewofboots's Avatar
slewofboots slewofboots is offline
267.31 GB/2.55 TB/9.76
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Re: mp3/lossless question for audiophiles...

Quote:
Originally Posted by slewofboots View Post
I would argue that for a lot of music genres FLAC (lvl 8) is not much less portable than high-bitrate encoded MP3. In other words filesize is close to 320kbps mp3.
I assume there exist portables capable of FLAC playback?

If so, and with decent headphones, this is certainly the way to be (more) portable and lossless!
I tested this and the starting .wav file (a live recording of Robben Ford, fully lossless) was 38MB.

File sizes for resultant FLAC was 14MB, and 8MB for the 320kbps MP3.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #115  
Old 2023-05-18, 04:42 PM
gideon77 gideon77 is offline
68.25 GB/90.94 GB/1.33
 
Join Date: May 2023
Re: mp3/lossless question for audiophiles...

I think this is an interesting discussion. It is reassuring that this site is so strict about mp3s so you know where the file came from. On the other hand, I have always recorded shows with my satellite receiver and those broadcasts are in mp2 or aac. I had no other option to record the shows myself from all over the world. I liked the sound from 192, 256 or 320 kbps better than fm and always tried to record my shows via satellite to the extent possible. Fm-recordings I received were also sometimes in mono or with lots of hiss. If I can choose between a show from 1980 recorded with a cassette recorder or a rebroadcast via satellite, I resolutely choose the last option. Sometimes I see "soundboard" on a show and after downloading it I am hugely disappointed by the poor sound quality. It is lossless, but that is all. Are we calling these people audiophiles? With video, we apparently don't mind this. I regularly see video recordings on this site with dvb as the description and then it says 256 kbps as audio. Are we all going to get our old
recorder again to watch our videos? I don't think so. As someone said here, sometimes it's too much about numbers.
No worries, I will respect the rules and only upload my own audience recordings on this site. I actually only record audience recordings as a souvenir and hardly ever listen back to them. And I will never compress a wav or flac file to mp3, let's be clear about that.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
Reply

The Traders' Den > Where we go to learn ..... > Technobabble

Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Lossy or lossless question.....wav > .flac sample included - starman714 Lossy or Lossless? 22 2006-01-03 02:31 PM
A question about speed correction of lossless files - starman714 Technobabble 21 2005-02-18 04:59 PM


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forums


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - , TheTradersDen.org - All Rights Reserved - Hosted at QuickPacket