The Traders' Den  

  The Traders' Den > Where we go to learn ..... > Technobabble > Lossy or Lossless?
 

Notices

Lossy or Lossless? Please use this forum to post spectral and frequency analysis posts about shows you have your doubts about.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 2005-05-12, 01:50 PM
Tate Tate is offline
21.53 GB/3.46 GB/0.16
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
MD, or MP3?

There should be a section here dedicated solely on lossy queries

Anyway, I'm not sure about a show I have. No lineage known, but it's an audience recording from 2003. I'm not sure though if it's MD cause the height of those flames (whatever you call them..) seems low to me. They end in a straight line at 13K, usually, the MD recordings I've come across end at around 16K. Could this be a MD recording, or maybe MD --> MP3?

Pics included. Thanks.
Attached Images
File Type: gif spec1.gif
( 316.6 KB, 90 views)
 
File Type: gif spec2.gif
( 268.5 KB, 63 views)
 
File Type: gif freq.gif
( 16.9 KB, 89 views)
 
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #2  
Old 2005-05-12, 02:55 PM
ssamadhi97's Avatar
ssamadhi97 ssamadhi97 is offline
meow.
87.81 GB/69.41 GB/0.79
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Old Europe
Re: MD, or MP3?

yikes. whatever it may be, it looks rather evil. I'd guess mp3 or mdlp (then again I don't really know what mdlp looks like), but I'm really not sure.

Either way this must sound pretty horrible.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #3  
Old 2005-05-12, 04:45 PM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: MD, or MP3?

It's lossy and low-quality for sure. Doesn't really look like mp3 encoding to me. might be mdlp, not sure. I'll have to get some mdlp samples from somewhere. IMO mdlp should really only be used for recording voice journals and the like.
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #4  
Old 2005-05-12, 04:46 PM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: MD, or MP3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tate
There should be a section here dedicated solely on lossy queries
We'll most probably have a new subforum for this in a week or two.
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #5  
Old 2005-05-13, 11:46 AM
Tate Tate is offline
21.53 GB/3.46 GB/0.16
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: MD, or MP3?

I never heard of mdlp The sound quality of the concert is not bad actually, it's distant but it sounds OK. Thanks for the help guys.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #6  
Old 2005-05-13, 08:45 PM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: MD, or MP3?

mdlp = MiniDisc LongPlay (low quality setting)

in case anybody's wondering!
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #7  
Old 2005-05-15, 04:50 PM
oldbrokentapes's Avatar
oldbrokentapes oldbrokentapes is offline
35.58 GB/62.83 GB/1.77
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: MD, or MP3?

I've been meaning to make some kind of reference guide of MD (incl LP) and mp3 spectrums using white noise samples for months. Is this worth my hassle once my exams are out of the way in a couple of weeks? Did a rough selection a while back but I need to sort it all out into a presentable form.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #8  
Old 2005-05-15, 05:43 PM
symon's Avatar
symon symon is offline
184.53 GB/286.97 GB/1.56
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: MD, or MP3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five
mdlp = MiniDisc LongPlay (low quality setting)

in case anybody's wondering!
I have an MDLP recording (from the days when I didn't know any better!)
I haven't transferred it to PC yet - but I'll try and provide some examples when I do.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #9  
Old 2005-05-15, 09:05 PM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: MD, or MP3?

Thanks guys, that would indeed be very helpful!

Rob, I would love it if you put together that guide, if you need any help please let me know.

Symon: when you transfer it to your HD perhaps you could send me a pm and perhaps I could get a hold of it via yousendit or whatever. thanks!
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #10  
Old 2005-05-15, 09:17 PM
farmstar's Avatar
farmstar farmstar is offline
106.03 GB/68.29 GB/0.64
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: upstate
Re: MD, or MP3?

I for one would love to see a comprensive spectral study. I have reieved some definately lossless shows that i cannot place, the spectral image and MD lineage solves a couple perhaps. It would be neat to see the LP spectral view.
__________________


Damn, my woodstove needs stoking
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #11  
Old 2005-05-16, 02:49 AM
oldbrokentapes's Avatar
oldbrokentapes oldbrokentapes is offline
35.58 GB/62.83 GB/1.77
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: MD, or MP3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five
Rob, I would love it if you put together that guide, if you need any help please let me know.
Cool, hopefully I'll get that done in a couple of weeks (or more like tomorrow as part of the daily procrastination routine!). From the quick notes I still happen to have here, this sample with a cut at 13ish kHz is definitely not LP2 (132kbps). Could be LP4 (64kbps Joint Stereo) but looks more like 128kbps mp3 to me.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #12  
Old 2005-05-16, 09:33 AM
Tate Tate is offline
21.53 GB/3.46 GB/0.16
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: MD, or MP3?

A reference guide sounds superb. Thanks, it will be very useful for all.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #13  
Old 2005-05-16, 05:27 PM
ssamadhi97's Avatar
ssamadhi97 ssamadhi97 is offline
meow.
87.81 GB/69.41 GB/0.79
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Old Europe
Re: MD, or MP3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by robkismet
I've been meaning to make some kind of reference guide of MD (incl LP) and mp3 spectrums using white noise samples for months. Is this worth my hassle [..]?
White noise samples? That's not worth your time at all and has little use really. I mean, how many of us do spend their time on listening to white noise?

Seriously though, the specific fingerprints of lossy audio encoders are a direct result of the different ways their respective psychoacoustic models react to various properties of the input audio signal to exploit weaknesses in human hearing. White noise is only one very specific kind of input signal, which is why a reference guide based on it would be of little use indeed.

For example the changing lowpass you can observe on many lossy recordings is there because of the changing spectral energy distribution - and in some cases even the absolute amount of energy - in the input signal. Encoders can be distinguished to some extent by the lowpass they pick when encoding a signal of a certain distribution. When encoding white noise you only take one special case into account (namely uniform distribution)

Another example where encoders behave differently would be transients - some encoders (mp3, aac) switch between different block sizes to increase coding efficiency for tonal (long blocks) and transient (short blocks) material, while others ("old-fashioned" short-play md for example) use a fixed block size in all cases. Again, on white noise encoders will not exhibit any of this behaviour.


In short, you'd be better off using some snippets of real music instead.

Best you'd pick a bunch of clips that cover as much ground as possible wrt encoder behaviour on different signal types (ideally clips that cover tonal, transient and noise signals and different energy distributions all at once)

Last edited by ssamadhi97; 2005-05-16 at 05:33 PM.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #14  
Old 2005-05-17, 07:51 AM
oldbrokentapes's Avatar
oldbrokentapes oldbrokentapes is offline
35.58 GB/62.83 GB/1.77
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: MD, or MP3?

I'd thought about this too and was unsure so thanks for your far more knowledgable advice. I was leaning towards doing sets with white noise, studio music, and also some less-than-stellar live recordings - should be interesting to see the differences too.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
Reply

The Traders' Den > Where we go to learn ..... > Technobabble > Lossy or Lossless?


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forums


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - , TheTradersDen.org - All Rights Reserved - Hosted at QuickPacket