The Traders' Den  

  The Traders' Den > Where we go to learn ..... > Technobabble > Lossy or Lossless?
 

Notices

Lossy or Lossless? Please use this forum to post spectral and frequency analysis posts about shows you have your doubts about.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 2005-02-08, 01:07 PM
dorrcoq's Avatar
dorrcoq dorrcoq is online now
Champion of the Silent
TTD VIP
727.47 GB/6.80 TB/9.57
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: MP3 OR NOT

Quote:
Originally Posted by irishcrazy2005
Just out of curiosity, what is wrong with the tools in EAC? Also, are there any good freeware/open source spectral analysis programs out there? I don't do any actual taping or audio remastering (nor do I know anything about it!), so I don't feel the need to shell out $$$ for CEP or Audition. Thanks!

-Phil
you could do what I did - download the free 20 day trial version of CEP. When the 20 days are up, you won't be able to do much else, but all the spectral analyses still work!
__________________
DON'T MESSAGE ME FOR RE-SEEDS. I DO NOT DO THEM!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #17  
Old 2005-02-08, 01:47 PM
kuba's Avatar
kuba kuba is offline
boogie chillun'
1.32 GB/184.09 MB/0.14
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Czech Rep.
Re: MP3 OR NOT

How can you tell a difference between ATRAC and MP3 sourced material just by looking at spectral analysis?? I mean, not every MP3 file is cut right above "xy" kHz, there are various encoders and bitrates, so it can be easily cut at "xy+2" or "xy+3.756" kHz... Do you see my point?
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #18  
Old 2005-02-09, 04:51 AM
tannis tannis is offline
heavy metal madman
333.85 GB/337.83 GB/1.01
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: england
Re: MP3 OR NOT

What would you guys say that this one was.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ScreenShot001.jpg
( 134.2 KB, 94 views)
 

Last edited by tannis; 2005-02-09 at 04:57 AM.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #19  
Old 2005-02-09, 08:55 AM
tannis tannis is offline
heavy metal madman
333.85 GB/337.83 GB/1.01
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: england
Re: MP3 OR NOT

ok , im trying my best to learn here and i have been back through all the related threads on the forum , so far ive gathered that blocky & haircuts =l lossy , therefore the analysis i posted above is clearly mp3 , just a couple of questions for the experts on here as ive recieved a job lot of discs and to me everyone of them is suspect in one form or another , now obviously i dont want to clutter up the thread with loads of attatchments so if someone could help here that would be appreciated.

1: i have a couple of discs where the frequency hits the wall at 18,000 , a little too high for mp3 i would have thought but they also have a hint of a haircut about them , whats the likely source for these.

2: if it's a minidisc recording what is the easiest way of determing that from an mp3 , i.e is there a distinct cut off point for a md recording compared to the 16,000 for mp3 , as a couple of these discs seem to have a drop off at around 14,000.

as you can probably gather by my wordings of the questions i dont know too much about this so be gentle
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #20  
Old 2005-02-09, 04:13 PM
ssamadhi97's Avatar
ssamadhi97 ssamadhi97 is offline
meow.
87.81 GB/69.41 GB/0.79
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Old Europe
Re: MP3 OR NOT

Well.. the "16kHz cutoff for mp3" thing is sort of a myth which does not even nearly hold true for all encoders and all bitrates.

It is generally "expensive" to store high frequencies, and we can't really hear much of them in "real world" / "real music" situations, so lossy formats in general tend to discard these first to save bits and use them to encode the things we actually CAN hear as good as possible. For most current audio codecs this means the lower the bitrate, the lower the cutoff will be.


Additionally, mp3 has a tendency to cut off at 16kHz most of the time even when there's a decent amount of bitrate available for encoding.

One problem of the mp3 format in general is that it is disproportionately inefficient at encoding signals above 16kHz, this is why any decent mp3 encoder avoids to encode such content as long as possible. Only if there's plenty of bitrate available or the signal is really strong above 16kHz the encoder will preserve these frequencies.


I guess the "mp3 = 16kHz cutoff" is related to the fact that for a long time the lion's share of mp3 files out there was encoded at 128kbps, a bitrate at which most mp3 encoders stop caring about content above 16kHz at all, because preserving any of it would be an insane waste of bits that are much better spent elsewhere (namely on encoding the content below 16kHz as good as possible)
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #21  
Old 2005-02-09, 05:18 PM
ssamadhi97's Avatar
ssamadhi97 ssamadhi97 is offline
meow.
87.81 GB/69.41 GB/0.79
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Old Europe
Re: MP3 OR NOT

Quote:
Originally Posted by kuba
How can you tell a difference between ATRAC and MP3 sourced material just by looking at spectral analysis?? I mean, not every MP3 file is cut right above "xy" kHz, there are various encoders and bitrates, so it can be easily cut at "xy+2" or "xy+3.756" kHz... Do you see my point?
On file format and encoder "fingerprints":

There are several characteristics that can be used to tell which lossy format (sometimes even which encoder, when it comes to mp3) was used to process an audio file.


Here are the (in my opinion!) most important things you can look for:
  • The cutoff frequency: an obvious tendency to cut off 16kHz usually equals mp3 (as explained in my previous post).
  • the "shape" of the cutoff
  • "blocking": pretty much all lossy formats require that samples are processed in blocks of a certain length. Most formats use only one or two different block lengths, so-called short blocks and long blocks. The length of these differs between formats. On a close-up screenshot of a spectrum you can estimate the block lengths and thereby identify formats.
  • stray blocks due to different decisions on which block to encode with which degree of detail

I'll fill in some blanks in this post next time I feel like it. To be continued...
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #22  
Old 2005-02-09, 10:49 PM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: MP3 OR NOT

Quote:
Originally Posted by tannis
What would you guys say that this one was.
this is most certainly lossy, as evidenced by the blocks. you can also tell it's VBR (variable bit rate) by the jagged blocky pillars. CBR (constant bit rate) tends to cut straight across.

I'm pretty confident about spotting lossy source (thanks especially to ssamadi97's posts going all the way back to STG), the tricky thing for me these days is identifying MD since this is the one lossy source that has wide acceptance amongst traders. If the source is pre-90's and blocky, it's certainly not good for sharing (at least not here or any of the other popular traders' sites).

This screenshot looks like it could from an MD source. From what I've seen, MD resembles other lossy VBR codecs with very fat "dash-like" blocks. btw, what is this show?

ps thanks ssamadhi97 for the excellent and informative posts (as per usual).
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #23  
Old 2005-02-10, 04:35 AM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: MP3 OR NOT

okay, back to the original topic, vicsbitz has sent me a 5.6 second sample of the original show in question. at this point I think this is mp3-sourced, not MD-sourced.

Frequency Analysis:
Attached Images
File Type: gif killers_fa.gif
( 12.0 KB, 76 views)
 
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #24  
Old 2005-02-10, 04:36 AM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: MP3 OR NOT

5.6 second Spectral Analysis:
Attached Images
File Type: gif killers_sa_5sec.gif
( 208.8 KB, 75 views)
 
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #25  
Old 2005-02-10, 04:37 AM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: MP3 OR NOT

2 second Spectral Analysis:
Attached Images
File Type: gif killers_sa_2sec.gif
( 205.6 KB, 74 views)
 
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #26  
Old 2005-02-10, 04:44 AM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: MP3 OR NOT

if anybody wants a copy of the SHN sample, just pm me.
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #27  
Old 2005-02-10, 10:02 AM
Tate Tate is offline
21.53 GB/3.46 GB/0.16
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: MP3 OR NOT

This is a good thread, very informative (we've got some real experts here )

Concerning the original post, I'd say it's MP3-sourced by looking at the zoomed-in spectral view. That area that I circled (sorry about stealing your pic Five ), that's typical of MP3.

One thing I did a while back in order to spot MP3s is I took a bunch of different MP3s I had and converted them to WAVE files, just to familiarize myself with the spectral view
Attached Images
File Type: gif killers_sa_5sec.gif
( 208.0 KB, 70 views)
 
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #28  
Old 2005-02-10, 02:17 PM
ssamadhi97's Avatar
ssamadhi97 ssamadhi97 is offline
meow.
87.81 GB/69.41 GB/0.79
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Old Europe
Re: MP3 OR NOT

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five
you can also tell it's VBR (variable bit rate) by the jagged blocky pillars. CBR (constant bit rate) tends to cut straight across.
Where did you get that idea? I doubt that it's possible to distinguish CBR from VBR using a spectrogram



^^ CBR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five
This screenshot looks like it could from an MD source. From what I've seen, MD resembles other lossy VBR codecs with very fat "dash-like" blocks.
..and regular MD (ATRAC) is a CBR codec too, at a constant 292kbps
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #29  
Old 2005-02-10, 03:30 PM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: MP3 OR NOT

I drew my conculsions from studying these screenshots that kotti put on STG ages ago. Check these out:
Attached Images
File Type: gif attachment_008.gif
( 213.0 KB, 935 views)
 
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #30  
Old 2005-02-10, 03:31 PM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: MP3 OR NOT

...
Attached Images
File Type: gif attachment.gif
( 189.7 KB, 831 views)
 
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
Reply

The Traders' Den > Where we go to learn ..... > Technobabble > Lossy or Lossless?


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forums


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - , TheTradersDen.org - All Rights Reserved - Hosted at QuickPacket