The Traders' Den  

  The Traders' Den > Where we go to learn ..... > Technobabble > Lossy or Lossless?
 

Notices

Lossy or Lossless? Please use this forum to post spectral and frequency analysis posts about shows you have your doubts about.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 2005-07-01, 09:49 AM
Tate Tate is offline
21.53 GB/3.46 GB/0.16
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Not sure if its lossy...

I need some help on this, I'm not sure if a bootleg I own is lossy or not? I'm always stumped when I think lossy from viewing the spectral view and then I'm not so sure anymore after looking at a frequency analysis.

Info: concert from 1982, soundboard recording. Looking at the spectral, the way it's all black on top and those blocks after close-up, could this be lossy?

Thanks for the help!
Attached Images
File Type: gif freq.gif
( 6.8 KB, 65 views)
 
File Type: gif spec1.gif
( 365.8 KB, 61 views)
 
File Type: gif spec2.gif
( 321.6 KB, 56 views)
 
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #2  
Old 2005-07-01, 11:06 AM
Ted Ted is offline
You are TOO
2.08 GB/7.38 GB/3.55
 
Join Date: May 2005
Re: Not sure if its lossy...

I'm still learning this stuff so it's fun to guess and then see what the experts say.

I'm GUESSING that it's lossless because there is no definite cut-off all the way up to 20k, looking at SA1.

The blocks in SA2 are due to you "zooming in" on the file. That's what digital looks like - no wavey lines, only blocks - again, only a guess.

Now, a question from me, for the experts:

Refer to the VERY faint spikes on either side of each "block" in SA2. Is that due to the noise made by the "switches" in the electronics (A/D converter, or whatever) of the computer itself? (or whatever electronic device recorded that file)
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #3  
Old 2005-07-01, 11:25 AM
AAR.oner's Avatar
AAR.oner AAR.oner is offline
TTD Staff
1.11 TB/1.41 TB/1.27
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Re: Not sure if its lossy...

i would venture to say lossy...yer dropping off around 18-19kHZ...in the SA, yer getting *black* above this freq. range, and the blocks seem too *blocky* for lossless...i'd wait for Five or one of the other experts before ruling, but that'd be my analysis

do you know what the source is [other than just SBD]? was it from an FM broadcast per chance?
__________________
TTD's Gear Lust Forum -- info & reviews on taping gear
The Basics of EQing
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #4  
Old 2005-07-01, 11:29 AM
Ted Ted is offline
You are TOO
2.08 GB/7.38 GB/3.55
 
Join Date: May 2005
Re: Not sure if its lossy...

Quote:
Originally Posted by AAR.oner
...the blocks seem too *blocky* for lossless...
Even though it's only ~2sec sample? I don't recall exactly at what resolution the "Wave" becomes blocky, so I coudl be wrong (I was once before, I think)

Where's Five, when ya need him?
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #5  
Old 2005-07-01, 03:15 PM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: Not sure if its lossy...

here I am

yes, this is lossy. it is high-quality lossy of some sort, I've seen this "signature" several times before. You can even see it zoomed out, but when you zoom in you can really see the unmistakable "lego skyline" effect. You can also see the unnatural "staircase" effect in the FA.

Try ripping a couple tracks off one of your favorite commercial cd releases and zoom in to your heart's content using SA and you will not see the lego skyline.
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #6  
Old 2005-07-01, 03:28 PM
ffooky ffooky is offline
56.17 GB/77.19 GB/1.37
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: Not sure if its lossy...

The "staircase" thing is obviously a specific characteristic of some process as it turns up so frequently and in my experience it's always been on the slightly older recordings.
__________________
Two tracks for a desert island:

Black Keys - I Got Mine
Tintern Abbey - Vacuum Cleaner
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #7  
Old 2005-07-01, 04:25 PM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: Not sure if its lossy...

can you post a couple screenshots?
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #8  
Old 2005-07-01, 04:46 PM
Ted Ted is offline
You are TOO
2.08 GB/7.38 GB/3.55
 
Join Date: May 2005
Re: Not sure if its lossy...

Maybe the staircasing has something to do with sampling rate - lower rate, bigger blocks? I remember zooming in on a .wav before and seeing it - it must have been a .wav from an mp3.

Another lesson for Ted
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #9  
Old 2005-07-01, 11:13 PM
Tate Tate is offline
21.53 GB/3.46 GB/0.16
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: Not sure if its lossy...

Thanks for the help guys!!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #10  
Old 2005-07-02, 02:40 AM
ffooky ffooky is offline
56.17 GB/77.19 GB/1.37
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: Not sure if its lossy...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five
can you post a couple screenshots?
Here you go. These are from a Peter Laughner tape from 1975. The same poster (on STG) seeded a whole load of Laughner material and all of it had the same characteristics.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg screenshot_01.jpg
( 209.2 KB, 32 views)
 
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Picture 2.pdf
( 683.4 KB, 8 views)
 
__________________
Two tracks for a desert island:

Black Keys - I Got Mine
Tintern Abbey - Vacuum Cleaner

Last edited by ffooky; 2005-07-02 at 02:46 AM.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #11  
Old 2005-07-02, 03:09 AM
ffooky ffooky is offline
56.17 GB/77.19 GB/1.37
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: Not sure if its lossy...

And here's another couple. The lineage for these is:

Radio Broadcast-18th March 1967 Master reels > Cassette >CDR >iTunes >Shorten >shtn(Soundboard recording)

This was part of jonsatticuk's Experience in Germany/Sweden etc series and I'd be extremely surprised if there was any digital compression here but you can still see the stairstep/skyscraper effect.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg screenshot_03.jpg
( 189.4 KB, 25 views)
 
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Picture 3.pdf
( 580.9 KB, 6 views)
 
__________________
Two tracks for a desert island:

Black Keys - I Got Mine
Tintern Abbey - Vacuum Cleaner
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #12  
Old 2005-07-02, 06:44 AM
Tate Tate is offline
21.53 GB/3.46 GB/0.16
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: Not sure if its lossy...

Hmmm, so stairstep/skyscraper doesn't always equal lossy??
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #13  
Old 2005-07-02, 07:51 AM
Ted Ted is offline
You are TOO
2.08 GB/7.38 GB/3.55
 
Join Date: May 2005
Re: Not sure if its lossy...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tate
Hmmm, so stairstep/skyscraper doesn't always equal lossy??
If you're refering to my comments, they're only guesses (sorry for any confusion)
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #14  
Old 2005-07-02, 08:41 AM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: Not sure if its lossy...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ffooky
And here's another couple. The lineage for these is:

Radio Broadcast-18th March 1967 Master reels > Cassette >CDR >iTunes >Shorten >shtn(Soundboard recording)

This was part of jonsatticuk's Experience in Germany/Sweden etc series and I'd be extremely surprised if there was any digital compression here but you can still see the stairstep/skyscraper effect.
This one looks almost identical to the '82 show in question. There was a Hendrix source in question a ways back that looked exactly like this and we all agreed that it was lossy, perhaps it is even this same one. I'll have to try to dig up the thread. Somebody even posted that they knew what group distributed it and gave the codec & bitrate info. I also saw one Yes show that also has this pattern. So looking at these Hendrix screenshots I conclude that this is also lossy. Yes, I know jon's stuff and it is some of the highest quality Hendrix ever heard but I'm sorry to say IMO this one is lossy like the other we are looking at. When I get a chance I'll dig for that old thread and get the exact encoder settings.
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
  #15  
Old 2005-07-02, 08:50 AM
Five's Avatar
Five Five is offline
189.30 GB/594.78 GB/3.14
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Re: Not sure if its lossy...

there's some very similar looking SAs posted here:
http://www.thetradersden.org/forums/...ead.php?t=4332

I still can't find the thread with the Hendrix show I keep talking about. Maybe we talked about it at TOTM or something. But there's some FA and SA for a Blind Melon show that I got pulled from EZT where it had this lego skyscraper pattern pretty much identical to the SA we're seeing posted in this thread. I have the original legoless version of that melon show and the SA doesn't have that!
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble

thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring
shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc

Quote:
Originally posted by oxymoron
Here you are in a place of permanent madness, be careful!
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes
Reply

The Traders' Den > Where we go to learn ..... > Technobabble > Lossy or Lossless?

Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Definitely Lossy ..... Right? - The FiXXXeR Lossy or Lossless? 2 2007-07-18 12:54 PM
Is this lossy? - Garteh Lossy or Lossless? 6 2006-05-21 08:38 AM
Are these lossy? - Meurglys0 Lossy or Lossless? 24 2006-05-16 12:15 AM
Lossy or md? - calvin1663 Lossy or Lossless? 3 2006-05-14 08:32 PM
Lossy? - nickdogg2001 Lossy or Lossless? 4 2006-04-21 04:06 AM


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forums


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - , TheTradersDen.org - All Rights Reserved - Hosted at QuickPacket