|
Site Announcements & Suggestions This is where you should make your suggestions to us on how to improve your experience here and where to post about site problems/issues.
Moderators |
|
Thread Tools |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Quote:
Millard didn't add sounds to his recordings... I assume you are familiar with tape marking. This guy is speaking his name over someone else's recording. It didn't happen at the show. Your whistle happened at the show. It was there. Millard was the taper. I wish he didn't mark.. but that was his business. He wasn't yelling "MIKE MILLARD" into a teac as he made copies. no one but a fucking imbecile would do some shit like that.
__________________
"There are some of these recordings where it is just a whirring, and you cannot hear the music. " - Jimmy Page, 2007 / JUL / 26 Torrent Help: seed policy | MiniDisc ban | seed guide | Ripping |checksum (st5 ffp) | restricted bands | software | download
No members have liked this post.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Quote:
adding your name audibly after the fact is rather lame. most tapers do mark shows in some manner, but most do it on the fly with announcing the date of the show, belching/sneezes, whistles, etc. thankfully i havent heard any one mark their tapes with farts. No members have liked this post.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
you just gave somebody an idea!
__________________
(\__/) (='.'=) (")_(") Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Sounds like a good plan to me....
No members have liked this post.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
sounds like a good rule to me, although it might get hard to tell in some cases if someone did a really good job at making them sound like they were in the audience at the time. It'd get hard to tell if they just yelled it then, or if it was put in later.
No members have liked this post.
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Why don't do you require seeders to disclaim either as a category choice or some other form that they fucked with something they didn't tape in the first place and just let the downloaders decide if they want it or not. You can't stop people from doing this stuff but you can dictate the terms of participation for this one venue. It is easy to get these guys to disclaim it since they tend to remaster not because they are good at it but do it to stroke their own egos.
No members have liked this post.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Is this really that big a deal? The only show I have that is "marked" was done by the taper, gave info on the gear, the date, and where the mics were set up. It is also after the show ended. And, I've d/l'd more than a few shows.
__________________
My work is done here. I will no longer be posting, commenting, or anything. I will check in now and then, but for the most part, I'm done. No members have liked this post.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
should not you also specify the type of wire?
or physical / mental condition of the tapers? which PA the band have used .... the music is the most important No members have liked this post.
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Quote:
However, some folks suggest "If you don't like it, don't download it". Well, I can't tell if I like it or not UNTIL I download it. Others say "Go find another source if you don't like what the seeder did here". Well, I don't really have anywhere to start other than here. I don't subscribe to DaD, and the only other torrent site I've used is an occasional dip in Pirate Bay. Someone who posted on the torrent thread seems to know who taped it, or who passed the tape to whom, but I'm out of the loop there. So; not a big deal, but I'd like to know how others feel about it, since it seems to go straight against the grain of what this site claims to stand for. Oh, and if anyone does have a clean source for the same show, please consider posting it here. No members have liked this post.
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Millard didn't add sounds to his recordings... I assume you are familiar with tape marking..[/quote]
Very familiar with tape markings, and YOU have no idea what I did to some of those masters before I "released' them, Captain Entitlement. So YOU need to quit pretending to be an expert on Mike Millard recordings or on and my Freezer tapes. Why don't you just stick to talking about the recordings YOU personally made, jimmy-jam? Prove it, jimmy.........PROVE it happed that way in every instance. You can't and know it, Cap.n. Quote:
And if he had lived, YOU know he would have denounced the torrent communities and sites. YOU know this is true. Mike Millard would have called out you and the entitlement community repeatedly. Any future FREEZER releases from this point out will include new markings --- go ahead and ban 'em... See if I give a fuck, jimmy-jam. No one but an imbecile would ban any future releases from my stash. You have no idea what's in there, and as they slowly leak out, you ain't got the balls to ban my recordings. But let's see you put your money where your mouth is, James-KY. Ban 'em, please. Make your promouncement that you are going to ban any future freezer recordings to surface will be banned at TTD from this point forward, OK? Starting now, Tuesday, November 9, 2010....OK? I sent out a package last week with some unreleased and uncirculated recordings. Go ahead and ban 'em. .....if the person who got 'em isn't already disgusted with the raqmpant entitlement running loose, as exemplified in this thread alone. AND I'll make a point of offeriung the YES recording from September 29, 1972, recorded in New Orleans Municipal Auditorium, from the same seats where I recorded Led Zeppelin in 1973. It will be marked audibly, I'm working on it now. I dare you to ban it. OR..........You can put up your personal recordings of YES from 1972, jimmy jam. Or your YES recordings from any year....or the Alice in Chains recording you made last month, OK? Good luck with all that, jimmy. No members have liked this post.
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
It's no big deal, unless you're under the delusion that you're entitled to have everytrhing on immediate demand.
Otherwise, a clean copy of this show will eventually appear. (Christ'A Mighty, I'd bet The TooleMan would have made the unbblemished version available himself, IF he hadn't been just ganged up on by the "Gimme-It-On-Demand" crew). UNLESS you're disturbed by how the taper marked it himself. Only an imbecile would publicly whine about something so petty as this. No members have liked this post.
Last edited by freezer; 2010-11-09 at 11:44 PM. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
You're surely not suggesting that this can't be discussed in open forum because you think it's 'whining' .....?
No members have liked this post.
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
leave it to bored post whores to take an honest question/concern, skip all intelligent discussion, & turn it into the same rehashed short bus battle we've seen time & again
i hear what yer sayin GRC, i find someone "marking" a recording [and especially one they didn't record & added in post] to be ridiculous and against the philosophy of this site...however, it'd be nearly impossible to police, since if we officially banned it certain folks would then purposely add em without saying so in the info, just to prove they can [cuz they're immature idjuts] No members have liked this post.
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
Quote:
Discuss away, but I'm still gonna add markings to my recordings, as did Mike Millard. Let's see someone ban my recordings across the board........ I'm only sayin'. werd. No members have liked this post.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can 'audio watermarks' be banned...?
I find calling people names is a surefire way to win an argument. Especially on the internet.
__________________
One day there was this minstrel Who came to court on a charge That he blew someone's head off Because his amp was too large No members have liked this post.
|
The Traders' Den |
|
|