Thread: AVI vs DVD
View Single Post
  #8  
Old 2006-01-12, 06:52 PM
Malth Malth is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Re: AVI vs DVD

Im not saying compress the hell out of it and make it look crappy, Im saying that some of this bitrate simply is not justified. If you can take a video and digitize with no loss in quality at say 300k/s, why would you need to jack that number up to 1900k/s?

Like I said, a prime example is the Nirvana Uncut DVD, the bitrate is simply way too high, and is not justified in any way shape or form. Im not advocating lowering a bitrate for the sake of lowering, Im advoicating choosing a realitic bitrate that properly reflects the source materials needs
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes