Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Five
Here's screenshots of the analysis using EAC... keep in mind I've got a 2-second sample, so the sa is "zoomed in" compared to desert_rat's sa. I also attached two screenshots of the fa, 1st one at 512 fft size, and the 2nd at 65536 fft size (maximum). You can see the dropoff a lot better with the fft size at maximum!
|
Sheesh! Just the discrepancy between the two EAC fas is astounding. Glad I have AnalFreq. And I guess I'll load up CEP or Audition after I reformat and use that as well. Crazy.
No members have liked this post.