View Single Post
  #2  
Old 2010-12-31, 06:55 PM
direwolf-pgh's Avatar
direwolf-pgh direwolf-pgh is offline
On the Beach
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: down in the basement
Re: having trouble with fingerprints

check FAQ here
http://www.thetradersden.org/forums/...=audio#faq_md5

.. and happy new year!


Quote:
FLAC's use of the fingerprint allows users much more versatility while still maintaining the same core functionality : verifiying that the audio in your files has not altered since it was seeded. Of course, a user may still use wholefile md5 checks on .flac files if they see fit, but this is a practice performed out of ignorance rather than functionality. Using FLAC's fingerprinting is much more useful than wholefile md5 checking, and should be used 100% of the time.


sample2007-04-15t01.flac:cb8a42007fe797435826a76cb527be01
sample2007-04-15t02.flac:25eb2520a33ed2b88edf41f5d6f09505
sample2007-04-15t03.flac:fbfced772c4d478f57072ffe9aeb2a69

Notice the file name is at the front of each line.
consider creating an .st5
Quote:
Inclusion of the shntool md5 into notes for original seeds is highly recommended, as it will help users confirm that they have clean filesets across many platforms and filetypes.


cb8a42007fe797435826a76cb527be01 [shntool] sample2007-04-15t01.flac
25eb2520a33ed2b88edf41f5d6f09505 [shntool] sample2007-04-15t02.flac
fbfced772c4d478f57072ffe9aeb2a69 [shntool] sample2007-04-15t03.flac

Notice the 32-digit number is the same as the fingerprint 32-digit number in the flac fingerprints above.
Reply With Quote Reply with Nested Quotes