[KoolKat]

Originally Posted by u2rulesmyworld

better quality than the dvd version.

Never in a trillion years will that be the case.
As DivX agree ,from the start the concept was solely a space saving idea & the quality was to get close to DvD......but never to DvD quality.Only a shallow person would think that possible.

You say yourself on many occasions "similar"....THAT is the point & THAT is the more than valid argument.Loss--ier.

You argue that mpeg2 is lossy and shoot it was an even lossier codec by admission of the makers of it.
So i don't see your argument really as you talk in a hypicrytical fashion about hypocricy.
Basically ,using DivX as your platform for a case ,you are trying to wipe shit off of the wall with used toilet paper.

DivX better quality indeed......should've gone to spec-savers chap.