|
lineage question
if you see analog master > DAT > DAT is this interpreted as DAT[0] > DAT[1] or DAT[1] > DAT[2]. I am assuming the first choice since the master is analog prior to the first DAT. Which is correct ? I just want to make sure... Thank you in advance.
__________________
"Schoeps Schmoeps!!!
(I don't hate Schoeps mics, just the snobs who foolishly believe excellent recordings can't be made without them.)" Falconidave
Mics: CA-14 (o,c,o)
Remote Power: CA-9100 pre-amp, CA-UBB battery box
Recorders: Sony PCM-M10, Tascam DR-2d
Cable/s: custom 6" GAKables Mini Starquad
Batteries: Maha 9.6V Imedion, Maha Powerex 2700 mAh
Chargers: Maha MH-C9000, MAHA MH-C490F
No members have liked this post.
|