wayne
2006-04-03, 06:23 PM
Hi,
Has anybody else noticed how inefficient FLAC seems to be at 24/96 ?
I've been transferring some cassette masters to HD at these rates, when compressing these files I'm getting files which are 75-80% the original size at level 8 FLAC. I'm archiving to DVD so its notthatmuch of a problem I did think I'd get better compression than this though. has anybody investigated any other schemes that may give better results ?
Wayne
Has anybody else noticed how inefficient FLAC seems to be at 24/96 ?
I've been transferring some cassette masters to HD at these rates, when compressing these files I'm getting files which are 75-80% the original size at level 8 FLAC. I'm archiving to DVD so its notthatmuch of a problem I did think I'd get better compression than this though. has anybody investigated any other schemes that may give better results ?
Wayne